01 February 2015 ~ 7 Comentarios

Por qué los nazis asesinaron a 6 millones de judíos (a propósito a Auschwitz)

Survivors of Auschwitz

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

7 Responses to “Por qué los nazis asesinaron a 6 millones de judíos (a propósito a Auschwitz)”

  1. Sebastian 1 February 2015 at 3:57 pm Permalink

    Investiga la verdad y llegaras al número real de víctimas judias.
    Investiga del sionismo también

    • Larry Harrison 3 February 2015 at 10:27 am Permalink

      Ademas de las razones históricas mencionadas por Carlos Alberto, hay un hecho comentado por Max Weber en su obra maestra “La Ética Protestante y el Espíritu del Capitalismo”: los judíos alemanes lograron bastante mas en términos de la educación y el ingreso que los alemanes protestantes y católicos, así promoviendo la envidia y el resentimiento.

  2. Roman Hernandez 2 February 2015 at 7:00 am Permalink

    Siempre veremos que la afinidad de grupo de los comunistas,con todos los que esten en contra de los judios de Israel,como Fidel con su apoyo a Arafat,Chavez y Maduro en contubernio con Iran a travez de Hezbolla,asi como la Kishner de Argentina.Todos ellos nos demuestran que esta teoria de grupos es una trite realidad,que se refuerza,cuando vez a un Amadenayau o algo asi ,que cuando era primer ministro de Iran ,llego a negar el holocausto,y estos senores siguieron en las mejores relaciones con el, e incluso,llegaron a estrecharlas aun mas con visitas mas a menudo y a bombo y platillos ,en las dos vias.

  3. Sam Ramos 2 February 2015 at 10:31 am Permalink

    Brilliant !!!

    Written by a British housewife to her daily newspaper.
    Highly politically incorrect but how true and courageous!

    Thought you might like to read this letter to the editor of a British national newspaper. Ever notice how some people just seem to know how to write a letter?
    Here is a woman who should run for Prime Minister!

    Written by a British housewife, to her daily newspaper:

    ‘Are we fighting a war on terror or aren’t we? Was it or was it not started by Islamic people who brought it to our shores in July 2002, and in New York Sept 11, 2001 and have continually threatened to do so again since?

    Were people from all over the world, not brutally murdered that day in Washington, and in downtown Manhattan, and in a field in Pennsylvania?

    Did nearly three thousand men, women and children die a horrible, burning or crushing death that day, or didn’t they?

    And I’m supposed to care that a few Taliban were claiming to be tortured by a justice system of the nation they come from and are fighting against in a brutal insurgency.

    I’ll care about the Koran when the fanatics in the Middle East start caring about the Holy Bible, the mere belief of which is a crime punishable by beheading in Afghanistan.

    I’ll care when these thugs tell the world they are sorry for hacking off Nick Berg’s head while Berg screamed through his gurgling slashed throat.

    I’ll care when the cowardly so-called ‘insurgents’ in Afghanistan come out and fight like men instead of disrespecting their own religion by hiding in mosques and behind women and children.

    I’ll care when the mindless zealots who blow themselves up in search of Nirvana care about the innocent children within range of their suicide bombs.

    I’ll care when the British media stops pretending that their freedom of speech on stories is more important than the lives of the soldiers on the ground or their families waiting at home to hear about them when something happens.

    In the meantime, when I hear a story about a British soldier roughing up an Insurgent terrorist to obtain information, know this:

    I don’t care.

    When I see a wounded terrorist get shot in the head when he is told not to move because he might be booby-trapped, you can take this to the bank:

    I don’t care.

    When I hear that a prisoner – who was issued a Koran and a prayer mat, and ‘fed special food’ that is paid for by my taxes – is complaining that his holy book is being ‘mishandled’, you can absolutely believe in your heart of hearts:

    I don’t care.

    And oh, by the way, I’ve noticed that sometimes it’s spelled ‘Koran’ and other times ‘Quran’. Well, believe me!! You’ve guessed it ……………….

    I don’t care!!

    If you agree with this viewpoint, pass this on to all your E-mail friends. Sooner or later, it’ll get to the people responsible for this ridiculous behaviour!

    If you don’t agree, then by all means hit the delete button. Should you choose the latter, then please don’t complain when more atrocities committed by radical Muslims happen here in our great country! And may I add:

    ‘Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. Our soldiers don’t have that problem.’

    I have another quote that I would like to add, AND……… I hope you forward all this.

    Only six defining forces have ever offered to die for you:

    1. Jesus Christ

    2. The British Soldier.

    3. The Canadian Soldier.

    4. The US Soldier

    5. The New Zealand Soldier, and

    6. The Australian Soldier

    One died for your soul, the other 5 for your freedom..


  4. JOSEF WEISS 6 February 2015 at 5:12 pm Permalink

    EL con movedor articulo de Gina Montaner en el Nuevo Herald el 2 de noviembre con el titulo Auschwitz NO debe desaparecer de la memoria EN EL DRAMATICO RECUERDO ENTRE OTRAS MENCIONES DICE LA PERIODISTA : “en el 70 aniversario de la liberacion de Auschwitz,lo mas
    conmovedor es que las voces que quedan se estan apagando. Aquellos ninios que se hicieron mayores de golpe y con la crueldad mas inusitada,un dia no tan lejano ya no estaran entre nosotros para sacudirnos de la adormecida rutina y recordarnos que los cuentos de horror pueden ser reales ” EN Francia grupos musulmanes ya estan atacando autobuses escolares de colegios judios, en Hungria un partido ultraderechista con programa hitleriana ya tiene mas del 30 % de los votos.En Argentina matan a un fiscal que esta averiguando un atentado contra un instituo judio con 90 victimas.En Paris a sangre fria periodistas caricaturistas. EL MUNDO CIVILIZADO ADORMECIDO debe recordarse como comenzaron las atrocidades en el mundo y como terminaron con millones de muertos.Efectivamente los voces de supervivientes se estan apagando .
    JOSE WEISS un superviviente de los horrores nazis.

  5. Sam Ramos 7 February 2015 at 9:16 am Permalink

    Who’s dividing US on backing Israel?

    By Seth Lipsky

    February 4, 2015 | 8:22pm

    How long can it last that the Republicans are the party that’s more supportive of Israel but the Democrats are the ones that get the Jewish vote?

    Could it be that President Obama is upending the old alliance?

    It’s for a reason that I pose those as questions. The landscape is littered with newsmen who’ve erroneously predicted that we’re at the end of the era when the Jewish vote goes automatically to the Democrats.

    Yet it’s hard to deny that there’s “a real crisis going on,” as Sen. John McCain put it on CNN over the weekend. What will happen if Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu shows up to address a joint meeting of Congress and the Democrats boycott?

    “I don’t know” is the answer Nancy Pelosi gave over the weekend to the question of whether most House Democrats would attend Netanyahu’s speech. The ex-speaker went on to sneer that if Netanyahu wants to get his message through, he could go on TV.

    Pelosi has also been carping about alleged violations of protocol by Speaker John Boehner in failing to consult with the White House — or her, the House minority leader — in arranging for Bibi’s speech.

    That strikes me as malarkey. As I wrote in this space last week, Congress has the standing to invite Netanyahu (or any other foreign leader) under half a dozen or more independent powers enumerated in the Constitution.

    All this pettifogging might mean something were it taking place in a vacuum. But the Democrats are changing. When they nominated Obama for a second term, they tried to abandon the pro-Jerusalem plank that had long been in their platform.

    When party leaders discovered this, they tried to bring Jerusalem back, only to be blocked by a voice vote. Delegates actually booed from the floor. It was only by ignoring the chorus of nays on the third attempt that the chairman declared the measure passed.

    Democrats like to point out that, even after that debacle, Obama won the Jewish vote by a large margin. This Jewish voting pattern is such an anomaly that the neoconservative sage Norman Podhoretz wrote a book called “Why Are Jews Liberals?”

    He concluded that secularism has replaced the truths of religion with what he called the “Torah of liberalism.” He could find no signs that this would change soon, but expressed the hope that there would eventually be an end of delusions.

    Podhoretz’s book came out in 2009. In 2012, the share of the Jewish vote that went for the GOP soared to 30 percent, up by more than a third from 2008. If it keeps moving in that direction at that clip, the old alignment could soon be history.

    Certainly it’s hard to think of a moment quite like that to which Obama has brought us. It’s not, after all, just the Jewish Republicans that he is alienating. He has actually accused members of his own party of kowtowing to political donors.

    This happened the other day, when the president vented about the distrust in Congress of his negotiations with Iran. According to The New York Times, Sen. Bob Menendez (D-NJ) stood up and told the president to his face that he took personal offense.

    No wonder. Menendez is the real deal, an old-style pro-Israel Democrat. He’s just lost his position as chairman of Foreign Relations because the voters reacted against Obama-ism and tossed the Democrats out of the majority in the Senate.

    This is a point to mark about the current flap. Obama wants everyone to think this is a fight between himself and Netanyahu. The more important fight is between Congress — Republicans and the Democratic Party’s pro-Israel camp — and a renegade president.

    He wants to negotiate with the Iranian mullahs without so much as a howdy-doo to the Congress. He resents Senate oversight, even when it’s led by a fellow Democrat. He wants Congress to trust him and the mullahs and not even listen to Netanyahu.

    The left is trying to palm off the idea that Netanyahu is destroying the bipartisan basis of America’s support for the Jewish state. It turns out to be Obama that’s doing the deed.

    We’ll know whether he’s succeeding by watching who shows up for Netanyahu’s speech.

  6. Luz Clarita/Marcielle 7 February 2015 at 3:37 pm Permalink

    Honestamente,me sorprendde que no se tenga ninga mencion sobre el grande y maximo “heroe nacional y apostle de Cuba JOSE MARTI” …por eso mismo el verdadero patriotismo y nacionalidad cubana se ha perdido… Yo no naci en Cuba pero mi padre cubano me ensenno a admirar a ese “verdadero heroe cubano” cuyo nacimiento se commemoro en Enero 28… pero bueno que vamos a hacer, yo personalmente gracias a mi padre siempre creo y seguire creyendo que JOSE MARTI , fue y seguira siendo lo mejor que ha dado la Isla esclava de Cuba,Gracios,Dios!!! BENDICIONES a todos.

Leave a Reply